For assistance, problems or questions, please email us.
Page History
Note |
---|
The instructions below are specific to Collegiate LT Assessment. But, the process would be similar for other events where Reliant was administering the application for approval to be attending the program. |
Concerned Assessments go through multiple stages of Review.
Reliant reviews Collegiate's Leadership Training event applications and accepts the event participants. If there are no concerns then Reliant will accept the applicant without any further steps needed. This page outlines the steps taken for applications that have concerns. Reliant event coordinator (Sarah) will send an email to each director if we see anything of concern to get the director’s approval before moving forward.
...
If a few smaller concerns are found, Reliant may still accept with no further review needed.
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTReliant needs to first verify that the program participant's assessment shows that they have responded with a YES to the Confidentiality Agreement on the |
...
event assessment. (We have added |
...
this new question to the |
...
assessment in the AGREEMENT |
...
Section asking for the participant's permission to discuss their |
...
assessment answers with their local pastor or |
...
named reference.) We will be required to honor their answer. If they |
...
respond NO, then Reliant will |
...
inform the collegiate reviewer that we see a concern but since they have answered the |
...
Confidentiality question with NO we do not have permission to discuss this further. Reliant will then give their recommendation |
...
to the collegiate reviewer and program director who can decide if they would like to move forward with the acceptance. |
If noteworthy concerns are found then the assessment is sent to the Collegiate Review stage. This typically means the Collegiate Reviewer will talk with the local pastor about the concerns and usually will ask the local pastor to meet with the applicant to discuss these concerns.
If the concerns are more serious, then the assessment is moved into the National Review stage. The Collegiate Reviewer will first confirm that the LT director would like to move forward. If so, then the national reviewers are asked to approve the applicant. The national reviewers consist of Reliant leadership and Collegiate national leadership (national LT director and a member of the collegiate national board).
Acceptance Criteria
ACCEPTANCE FOR PARTICIPANTS WITH NO CONCERNS
Reliant will automatically accept all participants that have no concerns on their application.
There are also a few smaller more frequently seen concerns listed below that typically appear on applications. It is Reliant’s understanding that in these scenarios the collegiate reviewer does not need to be notified and that acceptance is considered approved without notifying any further reviewers and is simply accepted with no questions by Reliant.
If a participant mentions that they have struggled with slipping once or twice with underage drinking
If they have slipped once sexual purity but it is no longer a struggle
If they struggle with masturbation but have accountability
Note |
---|
What happens if an applicant lies on their assessment? For reference, there was an applicant who lied on their application and was caught due to a discrepancy between what the LT applicant said and the spiritual reference said. This was the discussion/decision result. "We know that we love all these folks and want the best for them spiritually - but our responsibility is really just to determine if they are suitable for LT. At some point what we have to decide is......is knowingly lying on your application a disqualifying behavior or not? I like how we allowed there be some space for explanation (possibilities of miscommunication etc...) but I’m not sure exactly what mitigating circumstances were presented here that we would determine a ‘redo’ is in order. As a read the email thread what is saw was... this participant confessed after they got caught & feels bad. The church leaders like this participant and believe in them (which is wonderful but not surprising). I’m not all that excited about trying to determine the sincerity of an applicant’s repentance. I’m not sure we would ever be able to determine that - especially from afar - and I’m not even sure it’s our place. But I’d probably lean more towards a policy of - in the absence of extenuating circumstances - deceit in your LT application will result in a denial of admission / deferral til the following year." Therefore, it was agreed upon that if an LT participant lies on their application and there weren't extenuating circumstances the result will be that they can not attend LT the program. What happens if an applicant does not want to list their struggles on the assessment? There have been instances where participants did not feel comfortable sharing all of their struggles online in the assessment. We will then work with the local church to gather that information in person with the applicant. Here is a section of an email that was sent to an applicant who sent an email to Reliant saying that they did not feel comfortable with sharing online and requested just telling their local church pastor and not Reliant. ...The LT program is an event administrated by both Reliant and Collegiate. Your church pastor is both a pastor for the Collegiate network and he is employed by Reliant and his role this summer is Collegiate LT director. Reliant does a lot of the administrative work for the Collegiate missionaries and we run the behind the scenes admin for the LT programs. In order for Reliant to be able to provide liability insurance for the LT programs we have to have an assessment and a review vetting process for all of our applicants that helps us make sure the Leadership Training program (the summer ministry designed to help train leaders for our local churches) is the best fit for those applying. I can understand the concern for putting your struggles online in this day and age. So, Reliant would be fine with you meeting with a local church leader to share your answers in person if that would make you feel more comfortable with sharing. However, because Reliant is the administrator for the event, that local church leader will then need to share what you tell him with Reliant before we could move forward with the assessment process. He can speak in generalities (we do not need specific details), but we do need to know for insurance and liability reasons if there are any concerns. So, I wanted to make sure that you understood and knew that your church leader would still be sharing that information with Reliant after you share it with him. |
ACCEPTANCE CONCERNS DECIDED ON THE COLLEGIATE REVIEW LEVEL
There may be other concern scenarios where Reliant would like the Collegiate Reviewer to decide and work together with the program director and/or local pastor to be aware and to give their consent before approval/acceptance.
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
COLLEGIATE REVIEWERS DISCUSSES WITH LOCAL PASTOR/SPIRITUAL REFERENCESHere are steps that we suggest the Collegiate Reviewer taking once they receive an email from Reliant saying they have a concerned participant that warrants follow-up with the local pastor/spiritual reference and necessitates meeting one on one with the participant to discuss the concerns.
-Ask them to help you know more about who the person is and what you would be getting into by accepting them into the program.
|
Those scenarios include, but are not limited to:
An applicant applies for an LT program that is not associated with the school they are attending
Depression/anxiety (seeing a counselor and/or taking medication but it seems under control)
Alcohol usage (habitual underage drinking and/or lack of seeing underage drinking as an issue)
Sexual purity (continued issue and/or no accountability listed)
Pornography/masturbation (continued issue and/or no accountability listed),
Multiple concerns listed
Spiritual reference is unaware of the struggles listed by the participant
or the spiritual reference listed struggles that the participant did not.
Info |
---|
We have had a few national reviews where we uncover that they have struggled with suicidal concerns prior to 6 months ago. As a formality, we said that all of those still needed a national review before moving forward. The heart behind that was related to how severe the past self-harm struggle was, how close to 6 months ago it occurred, do they still have suicidal thoughts, etc. and to show that we did our due diligence by having multiple eyes on it before acceptance. |
We want to leave the final acceptance decision of these concerns in the hands of the Collegiate Reviewer and local pastor and director that will be with the participant all summer.
ACCEPTANCE CONCERNS DECIDED ON THE NATIONAL REVIEW TEAM LEVEL
Those scenarios include, but are not limited to:
- severe depression/anxiety (hospitalized, panic attacks)
- any kind of self harm/abuse (eating disorders, cutting, etc.)
- suicidal thoughts or attempts
- substance abuse (drunkenness, prescription drug abuse, etc.)
- illegal drugs
- sexual addiction
- parental issues
- multiple (more serious) concerns listed
- their spiritual reference is unaware of the serious struggles listed by the participant
- or their spiritual reference listed more serious concerns that the participant did not.
With any of the above concerns, we want to create information email trails to be able to provide legal protection for Reliant, Collegiate, and the LT program to prove we did our due diligence in vetting this participant with the additional follow up that was done by the Collegiate reviewer with the local pastor and the participant. Reliant will offer candid thoughts (speaking from a legal liability standpoint) prior to potential acceptance. It will almost always include a conditional acceptance from Reliant and those conditions are sent to the participant which strengthens our written legal protection for the program to show that we have diligently vetted the participant.
For those struggling with emotional issues or self-harm there may be additional steps taken prior to acceptance such as asking a counselor's opinion or having them continue counseling over the summer. See Conditions for Acceptance for more details on conditions and the conditional acceptance email.
Multiexcerpt include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Anchor Acceptance of a minor Acceptance of a minor
Acceptance of a minor | |
Acceptance of a minor |
ACCEPTANCE OF A MINOR
There have been times where a participant under 18 desires to attend the program. Lt@reliant.org will be notified during the assessment process and will reach out to the LT director to let them know.
In the case of the Collegiate LT program this happens often with children of Reliant missionaries who are also attending the program with their parents wanting to be participants. The YMCA has been known to hire participants under the age of 18 for the Collegiate LT participants. However, the YMCA is not legally allowed to let them live in their provided employee housing. In the case of a Reliant missionary son/daughter, the participant can live outside of the dorms on YMCA property with their parents.
If the applicant is not a child of a Reliant missionary that is also a part of the LT program, if a director wants the minor to attend the program they will need to find separate housing for that participant. The director will need to discuss the living situation options for the minor with Reliant before moving forward with finding housing off YMCA property as this is a higher liability for all
- SEE ALSO: Conditions for Acceptance
- SEE ALSO: Counseling for Event Acceptance
- SEE ALSO: Not Accepted for the Program/Event
There are two categories of concerned applications.
One, is the typical red flags (porn, alcohol, purity) where they have slipped up on occasion and they are seeking help and their spiritual reference knows about it and they are working through it. For those types of concerns, we just want to make sure the director is ok with accepting them so Reliant is just looking for the director to say yes (rather than having Reliant make the call since directors will be spending the summer with them).
The other type of concern is the more serious concerns (self harm, consistently/habitually making bad choices, multiple concerns listed, the spiritual reference mentions nothing about their struggles, etc.) where we will ask the director to speak with the local pastor going to attend LT with them or local spiritual reference and have them have a local, in person interview and discuss the concerns with the LT applicant. We will ask them to document the discussion over email and send it to Reliant. Reliant would like to add one more thing to concerns of this type. For liability purposes, we have to show that we used sound judgement in choosing who we accept. So, we are thinking for people who we are super concerned about (ex. need to ask a pastor to have a follow up conversation with them) that we consider their acceptance a conditional acceptance. We’d like to send an email to those participants to say something like based on the results of the local interview we are conditionally accepting you into the LT program. But, we reserve the right to continue to monitor how things are going and make suggestions and if we feel that they need to seek medical attention or counseling, or if they are not displaying the character we request as a participant in the LT program, etc. then we reserve the right to send them home.
Reliant wants to keep the decision for the most part in the hands of the LT directors.
The only case that Reliant would say absolutely no is in cases such as the parent has said no way their son/daughter absolutely can not go. It would say on the application "WE HAVE PERSONALLY ADVISED OUR SON/DAUGHTER NOT TO PARTICIPATE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS". and an example of a reason would be... "I have read that this location has a high crime rate and as her mom, I am NOT ok with this." In the case of a parent saying no way they absolutely can not go then Reliant would say we just can not accept them due to liability reasons.
In general, most parents say they have concerns and those are fixed after the parents have a discussion with the LT director. You may see: "WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO OUR SON/DAUGHTER PARTICIPATING, BUT WE HAVE THE FOLLOWING RESERVATIONS THAT WE SIMPLY WANT TO MAKE RELIANT AWARE OF"....... and that usually follows with a question or concern that Reliant will then send an email to ask the director to follow up with the parent to discuss.
...