For assistance, problems or questions, please email us.
Page History
...
- Reliant Review (currently performed by the LT Admin, Caleb)
- If concerns are identified, it is passed on to the Collegiate Review
- If larger concerns are presented, it is passed on to National Review (currently performed by LT National Director (Chad Frank), Collegiate National Board member (Rick Keith), and Mike Swann (Reliant legal), if needed Dave Meldrum-Green and coordinated by Caleb Hayworth).
- We will need to keep records of conversations during this phase since it is not documented within Breezy.
- If serious concerns are listed, it goes to Counselor Review (currently filled out by one of the Collegiate Reviewers after discussion from the local church and then approval from National Review).
...
LT directors who are interested in what stage their participants are in can use a Collegiate LT - Breezy Reports to query the list. They will need to request permissions from the Reliant LT Admin, Caleb Hayworth.
Collegiate Review
The first step in the LT application process is for a Reliant Reviewer to be the first set of eyes on the application. This may be a Reliant employee or Reliant Central Staff.
...
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Once you log into Breezy, you will need to select the Position you are reviewing (either Estes Park Leadership Training or Adirondack Leadership Training). You can then see all the stages as you scroll right and left, but you will want to click the applicant within the Collegiate Review stage. Once you click on the applicant's name, you will see their application profile: Once you are here, you will want to select More > Team Scorecards so you can review the scorecard Reliant submitted. This scorecard will contain the initial concerns. Below some (not all) of the questions, you want to click "+Show Feedback" to read the comments the Reliant Reviewer submitted. After reading the Reliant Reviewer scorecard, you will want to select "Questionnaires" and carefully review all the information the applicant submitted. Lastly, you will want to review the references. To find these, select More > References. You can then click on each reference to see what the reference said concerning the applicant. After reviewing all the information, you are ready to write your comments on your own scorecard. To do this, click Scorecard on the right-hand side of the screen. You can even pull up other information on the left side as you follow the Scorecard and make your own comments. If a follow-up is necessary, then you will need to note who you're following up with and what is/was spoken about. Be sure to click the blue Save Scorecard button often and before you close the application. Once the follow-up is complete, you can log back in and enter comments in one of the decision areas (Accept With Conditions, National Review, or Decline Acceptance). If you want to do a normal acceptance, you do not need to make any comments in these areas. You will also need to enter your comments at the top of the scorecard in the "Thoughts on this Candidate?" box. Once you have entered all of your comments and clicked on Save Scorecard, you will be ready to move them to the next stage. To do this, click the blue Change Stage button. You will see a dropdown of stages you can move them to. You will want to select the one that is appropriate. Stages have triggers associated with them, so please make sure you move them to the correct stage. Triggers fire right away and can not be reversed. After you have selected an option on the Change Stage button, you will see a green "Stage Updated" box at the bottom. You may then click the X in the top right corner to close the application or close the window entirely. |
- The Collegiate Reviewer will then call or text the local church leadership to discuss the situation.
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
In the Collegiate Review stage, the Collegiate Reviewer(s) will receive an email from Reliant saying they have a participant whose application warrants follow-Breezy saying an applicant has been assigned to them. This is your cue to review the application and prepare to follow up with the local pastor/spiritual reference. (This means they found a concerned participant that warrants follow-up with the local pastor/spiritual reference and necessitates a meeting one on one with the participant to discuss the concerns.) In those cases, here are the steps that we suggest the Collegiate Reviewer(s) take.In those cases, here are the steps that we suggest the Collegiate Reviewer(s) take.
|
The Collegiate Reviewer will then email LT@reliant.org along with the local church leader as a written recap of their phone or text conversation and ask the church leader to reply all to that email once they have met with the LT applicant.
The local church leader will reply to the email and answer the questions asked with updates from meeting with the LT applicant.
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
This is a sample email with more case- | ||
UI Expand | ||
| ||
This is a sample email with more case-specific info so to speak being italicized for clarity. Thanks! Hi [spiritual reference]! So good to talk to you. I’m excited for what your time with [applicant] is going to look like and trust that God wants to work in and through that time to hopefully help prepare her for a great summer at LT. Remember the information that I shared with you is confidential and can only be discussed with [applicant], LT Assessors, and Reliant administrators. Here’s what we discussed in our call:
When you're done with your meeting, please let us know your answers to the above questions by replying all to this email, including informing us of your perception of her overall demeanor throughout the conversation. Thank you so much for partnering alongside us to love and support students well in this process.
|
...
|
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Those conditions will be shared with the LT director through the LT Shepherding Document. The Shepherding google doc is used by Reliant and the LT directors to continue to review and receive updates on those that had concerns found on their LT assessment. The Shepherding google doc lists those that had conditions for acceptance and usually required staff follow-up throughout the summer. The director would then assign a staff accountability person to meet with the participant and hold the participant accountable during the program to the conditions that have been put in place. We suggest finding someone who has a shepherd's heart and also clearly identifies this as part of the role prior to the beginning of the program. If possible, have the staff member reach out to the participant before they arrive at the program to begin discussions and gain trust. The directors are responsible for assigning someone to update the shepherding google doc with how the follow-up is going to keep Reliant and Collegiate in the loop. |
Concerns decided on a collegiate Collegiate level:
Those scenarios include, but are not limited to:
...
We want to leave the final acceptance decision of these concerns in the hands of the Collegiate Reviewer and local pastor and LT director that who will be with the participant all summer.
...
Info |
---|
In general, we say that all self-harm concerns need to be brought to national review. When reviewing suicidal concerns, we ask that you inquire about 1) the date(s) of occurrence (if not already stated) and frequency of suicidal thoughts, and 2) whether have they had any suicidal thoughts since filling out the assessment. The heart behind this is related to how severe the past self-harm struggle was, how close to 6 months ago it occurred, do they still have suicidal thoughts, etc., and to show that we did our due diligence by having multiple eyes on it before acceptance. However, if the Collegiate reviewer finds out after discussing with the local church leader that there are no current self-harm thoughts and a normal acceptance is recommended, then we do not need to present this concern to the National Reviewers. This would be only for those that Collegiate Reviews recommend as normal acceptance (no conditions at all for acceptance) because the self-harm (thoughts or actions) is no longer happening. If self-harm is still somewhat still in the picture and they are recommending conditions, it would still need to come to a national review for more eyes to view the situation. |
National Review
If the next step is a
...
National Review, then the Collegiate Reviewer will first reach out to discuss the concerned applicant with the LT director(s). If they want to move forward, then the Collegiate Reviewer will tell them to make a note on their Breezy scorecard to move forward with National Review (see below)
...
.
National Review
Concerns decided on a national National level:
Info |
---|
In general, we say that all self-harm concerns need to be brought to national review. However, we have had a few national reviews where we uncover that they have struggled with suicidal concerns prior to 6 months ago. As a formality, we had said that all of those still needed a national review before moving forward. The heart behind that was related to how severe the past self-harm struggle was, how close to 6 months ago it occurred, do they still have suicidal thoughts, etc., and to show that we did our due diligence by having multiple eyes on it before acceptance. However, if the Collegiate reviewer finds out after discussing with the local church leader that there are no current self-harm thoughts and a normal acceptance is recommended, then we do not need to present this concern to the National Reviewers. This would be only for those that the Collegiate Reviewer(s) recommend as normal acceptance (no conditions at all for acceptance) because the self-harm (thoughts or actions) is no longer happening. If self-harm is still somewhat in the picture and they are recommending conditions, it would still need to come to a national review for more eyes to view the situation. |
...
- The Reliant LT National Reviewer will move the applicant to Counselor Review in Breezy, and Breezy will notify the Collegiate Reviewer that a counselor "recommendation" is needed. (We use the word recommendation, but the counselor is not allowed to make an actual recommendation due to liability on their end. They can however assess how the applicant is doing, which will help us determine the next steps.) It will also email both the Collegiate Reviewer and the local church pastor with instructions asking them to let the participant know we would like them to receive a counselor review.us determine the next steps.) It will also email both the Collegiate Reviewer and the local church pastor with instructions asking them to let the participant know we would like them to receive a counselor review.
UI Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
UI Expand | ||
| ||
To Mike and Jason the Collegiate Reviewer and the local church pastor Subject: Counselor Review Instructions: {{ applicant.full_name }} Hello! The National LT Program Reviewers have requested a counselor review for {{ applicant.full_name }} due to the nature of the concerns on their assessment. The applicant may or may not have been asked this question based on their responses in the assessment (so the below answer may be blank), but here are their responses on their assessment regarding counseling:
Please follow up with the applicant to confirm that they are willing to ask their counselor for a current assessment and stabilization plan and share the information below on how to receive a current assessment and stabilization plan. Mike Klunke can assist you with any questions. There may have also been other conditions requested for this applicant that Mike will share with you as well when he follows up. It is a standard procedure for a counselor to talk to someone about their client if the applicant is willing to sign a release form. The counselor is then able to share their current assessment and stabilization plan. Please ask the applicant to sign a release form with their counselor (the release form would be given to them by the counselor upon their request) giving the counselor permission to share their current assessment and stabilization plan for Program attendance with Mike Klunke (National LT Assessor) as the receiver. Mike Klunke's email is mike.klunke@reliant.org. Here is a sample letter template that you can share with the applicant to fill out together with their counselor to receive their current assessment and stabilization plan for their attendance to the Program. Sample Letter from Counselor We also require all applicants needing a counselor review to create a safety plan. A copy of this plan will be shared with the Program Directors, the Program leader assigned to meet with the participant, and Reliant. Please ask the applicant to fill out this safety plan (we recommend local leadership review it with them) and please send a completed plan to Mike Klunke (mike.klunke@reliantLT@reliant.org). Safety Plan Template Most counselors will not be able to continue meeting remotely during the summer due to the fact that the applicant will be in a different state. If needed, you can ask the applicant if they would potentially be willing to meet with a local counselor during the Program. Reliant Field Staff can view Counseling for Event Acceptance on Solomon for more details on options for counseling at the different Programs to discuss the options with the applicant. Please also inform the applicant so that they are aware that if they are accepted, it is always recommended that an applicant needing a counselor review to be assigned an LT Program leader to meet with on a regular basis during the Program for accountability. If possible, we suggest that the LT Program Director reach out to the applicant prior to the beginning of LT to follow up and see how things are currently going (in case things have changed between now and the beginning of LT) and also to let them know the name of the leader that will be meeting with them over the summer. Recommended Steps for talking with the applicant: The local church leadership would set up a meeting with the applicant and explain the following:
|
...
- The local church pastor will talk with the participant and give them the counselor review information, requesting the participant to ask a counselor for their recommendation and to send that recommendation to the Collegiate Reviewer.
- Once the Collegiate Reviewer has heard back from the counselor :If and the green light is given:
- ,
- Then the Collegiate Reviewer will make a note on the scorecard in the "Accept with Conditions" box and assign the applicant to Leadership Training.
- LT@reliant.org will be notified the applicant has been assigned and will send the conditional acceptance email.
- A safety plan (see below) is required for anyone accepted in a counselor review stage.
- If Collegiate Reviewer receives a reason to be concerned, you have the approval to decline the applicant.
- Move the applicant to the Declined stage and Breezy will send the applicant a declination email.
...